Read the excerpt from William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar.
Which connection could a reader best make to the
text?
CAESAR:
Doth not Brutus bootless kneel?
CASCA:
Speak, hands, for me!
[Casca stabs Caesar in the neck. Caesar catches hold
of his arm. He is then stabbed by several other
Conspirators, and at last by Marcus Brutus.]
CAESAR:
Et tu, Brute? - Then fall, Caesar!
[Dies. The Senators and People retire in confusion.]
This reminds me of reading about Caesar's
assassination in history class.
This reminds me of the biography I read about
William Shakespeare.
This reminds me of a book I read about political
conspiracy theories.
This reminds me of reading about Caesar's early
career in the army.

main idea: it is important to prepare today for the needs of tomorrow.

the grasshopper was dying due to hunger, and this was because he didn't prepare for the winter.

the ants told the grasshopper, "if you were foolish enough to sing all the summer, you must dance supperless to bed in the winter."

the ants were spending a fine winter's day drying grain collected in the summertime.

its probably a noun because a noun is a person place or thing

biographical remarks present the shifting perception and re-interpretation of figures projected by the authors, or by the society represented by the authors. the portrayals in biographical accounts thus reflect the turning view-of-value in course of history. this paper particularly explores the ways in which “heretical” figures are represented in their biographical accounts, focusing on arabic zindīq poets who flourished in the 2nd century a.h. and are known for their extreme or heretic behavior. it will be discussed that the marks of their heretical deeds are presented in different ways, and the actuality of their activity, such as the association with the early theological thinkers (or mutakallimūn in arabic), is occasionally replaced by more narrativized and unrealistic anecdotes in later sources, the tales being reproduced to underscore the value of poets such as humor or quick-wittedness. the anecdotes also can highlight the qualities of their opponents who appear as their refuters. the chronological tracing of their biographical information from multiple sources reveals the fluctuating value of discourses of “heresy,” mirroring the turning religious reality and the imagined quality of the figures lived in the early period. the paper eventually aims to historically contextualize the functions of “speaking-about-heretics” as a subject of narratives, which works as a tool for writers to express manifold contemporar