Read the passage. Resolution: There should be a tax on plastic bags.

Affirmative position: Taxing plastic bags will reduce plastic waste and improve the environment.

Evidence: Tons of plastic pollutes our planet and oceans each day. It is extremely hard to break down plastic, as it is not biodegradable. Taxing plastic bags in grocery and retail stores will encourage shoppers to use paper or tote bag alternatives.

Which strategy is best for the negative position to use to create a strong rebuttal against the affirmative position?

explaining that the tax will not make a significant difference in the amount of plastic waste
presenting the idea that the improved environment is worth the extra taxes and asking a follow-up question
explaining that the source used by the affirmative position is unreliable and suggesting an alternative source
presenting the plastic-tax argument in a different way by stating that it would be an unnecessary burden for people