Paulo is analyzing “The Grand Canyon of Arizona.” Which choice would best complete his analysis? Under the subheading , George Wharton Jones primarily uses commentary to explain the Grand Canyon’s magnificence.

A. Wonder of the Grand Canyon

B. Impression on beholders

C. Its physical features

Wonder of the Grand Canyon

The United States has seven magnificent natural wonders: Niagara Falls, Yellowstone, Yosemite, the Natural Bridge, Mammoth Cave, the Petrified Forest, and the Grand Canyon. Those who have carefully studied the Grand Canyon, however, do not hesitate for a moment to pronounce it the most sublime of all earthly spectacles. It is 217 miles long, from 5 to 12 miles wide, and from 5,000 to 6,000 feet deep. While there are valleys in the world that are longer and a few that are deeper, the Grand Canyon as a whole is truly the most awesome thing on earth.

Impression on Beholders

Because of its vastness, its sublimity, and its grandeur, the canyon is unique and stands alone in nature. Within its depth and length, it expresses within that distance more than any one human mind yet has been able to comprehend or interpret for the world, for famous writers have attempted it and great painters have tried it, but all alike have failed. The Grand Canyon is one of the few things that a person is utterly unable to imagine until actually coming into direct physical contact with it.

Its Physical Features

Seeing the canyon at any time is bewildering and breathtaking, but it is especially so in the early morning, during the hours of dawn and the slow ascent of the sun, and equally so in the very late afternoon and at sunset, when its most entrancing effects can be witnessed. At midday, with the sun glaring into its depths, the reds and chocolates of the sandstones are so strong and the relieving shadows so few that the canyon almost seems uninteresting. But watch it in the morning and evening light! What revelations of forms; what richness of colors; what transformations of apparently featureless walls into angles, arches, recesses, facets, friezes, and facades; what lighting up of towers, temples, buttes, pinnacles, ridges, peaks, and pillars of erosion! The colors are vivid, and the shadows range from purple to black; the heights are towering, and the depths are appalling; the sheer walls are poised giants in the air. Who can really take in such a view?

source text: from the sketch here given it will be seen, that our good grandmothers differed considerably in their ideas of a fine figure, from their scantily dressed descendants of the present day. a fine lady, in those times, waddled under more clothes even on a fair summer's day, than would have clad the whole bevy of a modern ball room. nor were they the less admired by the gentlemen in consequence thereof. on the contrary, the greatness of a lover's passion seemed to increase in proportion to the magnitude of its object—and a voluminous damsel, arrayed in a dozen of petticoats, was declared by a low-dutch sonnetteer of the province, to be radiant as a sunflower, and luxuriant as a full blown cabbage. certain it is, that in those days, the heart of a lover could not contain more than one lady at a time; whereas the heart of a modern gallant has often room enough to accommodate half a dozen - - the reason of which i conclude to be, either that the hearts of the gentlemen have grown larger, or the persons of the ladies smaller — this however is a question for physiologists to determine. add punctuation to the following excerpt. writing under the name of diedrich knickerbocker washington irving aimed his potent satire at as diverse topics as political rivals such as thomas jefferson to the very ideal of looking back on the past affectionately: a fine lady, in those times, waddled under more clothes even on a fair summer's day, than would have clad the whole bevy of a modern ball room. a voluminous damsel, arrayed in a dozen of petticoats, was declared by a low-dutch sonnetteer of the province, to be radiant as a sunflower, and luxuriant as a full blown cabbage. in those days, the heart of a lover could not contain more than one lady at a time; whereas the heart of a modern gallant has often room enough to accommodate half a dozen

answer: hawkeye or antman (ik hes not really an avenger, but it's okk)

explanation: cause they the best

the answer is not

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).