Based on what you have learned, do you think this experiment is ethical? Why or why not? Be sure to answer in a minimum of three
to five sentences (more is fine) *
Your answer

Clearly show? ramona: anna, where does the theme seem to change? anna: according the article: "the fault lies with the fda's inability to release enough information in order to regain the public's trust. but perhaps japan is to blame as well. although there are plans to remove the spent nuclear fuel rods and build a permafrost wall around the four damaged reactors, is this really enough to recover damaged trust? " and then sato goes on to explain this statement. o a. challenging established ideas o b. using evidence to support your conclusions o c. asking clarifying questions o d. synthesizing claims into a single conclusion

Which is easier to identify direct or indirect characterization? why

Which resource is most useful for finding the correct spelling of words?