In these paragraphs, Kant says that it is possible for societies to exist where no one uses his talents or where no one has compassion for another person, but that no person could “possibly will that this should be a universal law of nature or be implanted in us as such by a natural instinct.” Why does he feel he can make assumptions about this? Do you think he’s accurate in doing so? HELP
HELP

I will tell you tomorrow

Deontology is the ethical theory that sees morality as doing one’s duty by following rules, without considering the probable consequences of one’s actions. The moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant exemplifies deontological normative ethics.

Recall where we left off in the prior section where we considered Kant’s epistemological position that moral duty must be sought a priori “in the conception of pure reason.” Further, the foundation of practical reason can be found in a single common moral principle that applies universally. (Passages included from Kant’s writing are from Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals.)

…if the critique of a pure practical Reason is to be complete, it must be possible at the same time to show its identity with the speculative reason in a common principle, for it can ultimately be only one and the same reason which has to be distinguished merely in its application.

Explanation:

hope it help brainliest pls

the author is showing that it is the insatisfaction of basic needs that brings about the protests such as the strikes.if workers do not earn enough to buy food and feed their families and themselves in order to continue working, what is the use of working? besides, another message from the author is that of the owners of factories should be worried about ensuring their furure by having a second and third generation of workers in their industries.if they do not hear the workers demands, they will not have any more workers to make their pockets full.