Read the excerpt from act 4, scene 1, of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. [ANTONY.] And now, Octavius,
Listen great things—Brutus and Cassius
Are levying powers. We must straight make head.
Therefore let our alliance be combined,
Our best friends made, our means stretched,
And let us presently go sit in council,
How covert matters may be best disclosed,
And open perils surest answerèd.

OCTAVIUS. Let us do so: for we are at the stake,
And bayed about with many enemies;
And some that smile have in their hearts, I fear,
Millions of mischiefs.

Which correctly reflects a conflict of character vs character?

The weather has been filled with lightning and wind making travel difficult.
Antony and Octavius must join forces to win in battle against the combined forces of Brutus and Cassius.
Ocatvius is doubting his own abilities to be equal to Antony in his leadership.
Cassius and Octavius have both worked to turn society against the cause of the other.

Antony and Octavius must join forces to win in battle against the combined forces of Brutus and Cassius

Explanation:

A character vs. character conflict, also refers to as man vs. man conflict, and it's when two characters struggle against each other. It should be noted that the conflict between the individuals can be physical or differences in beliefs or morals.

The option that reflects a conflict of character vs character is Antony and Octavius must join forces to win in battle against the combined forces of Brutus and Cassius.

"The weather has been filled with lightning and wind making travel difficult" is character" is character vs nature.

the second sentence is a great revision in my opinion. that would be a great topic.

explanation:

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."