Are the authors in disagreement with some other way of thinking? That is to say, is their a "They say" in their "I say"? Who are "they" and what is Mischel disagreeing with? What is he bifurcating from? And what does he discover in his research?

Hello. You did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.

The only way to answer this question is to read the text it refers to. During this reading, you will be able to identify if the authors disagree, if they present opposite opinions on the same subject. Once you've identified this, you will need to understand what point in this issue they disagree with and why this disagreement is happening. This reason will be exposed in the textual evidence, where the authors will present sentences that justify their opinions, showing why this opinion is correct.

What these authors discover about the research will be presented in the conclusion of the text, in the last paragraph, where the authors can infer about everything that was discussed in the text.

not exaxtly

explanation: it depends on the situation like if u do something good there will be good consequences which arent punishments but if you do somthing bad there will be bad consequences which are punishements.

government played the key role in promoting industrialization in russia while individual businesses played a larger role in great britain. or for apex a