Using the library or the Internet as a resource, locate and watch TWO different live production interpretations of Act III of Our Town. Then, compare and contrast how the two interpretations represented the original play. Did either of the interpretations make any changes to the original material? If so, how did it affect your experience as a viewer? Did you interpret the characters any differently after watching the live productions? Why or why not?

answer: the first one

explanation:

explicitly is defined as “in a clear and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.” the rest are interpretive and not clearly proven leaving in fact possible “confusion or doubt” which explicitly, by definition cannot have.

halibut, flounder, tuna, and trout are all fish. so your first answer is 1.) fish. and since fish is edible, your next answer would be 3). edible

to describe those fishes more thoroughly, some of those fishes live in fresh water, and some of the fishes live in salt water, and that is not a thing that they all have in common. the question is asking what is common with all of the fish, so answer choices 2). fresh water and 4). salt water are not right.

this is an ad? the hell is your audience bro xd

explanation:

what is the question?