Explain how convincing you think the argument is. Why should one accept the argument? If not, what prevents the argument from being compelling? Are the supporting claims true or reasonable? What types of claims does the writer resort to (Fact, Value, Cause and Effect, Policies).
Does it have sufficient evidence to support the claim or does the argument have knowledge gaps? What types of evidence is presented What questions need to be answered to close these gaps?
What rhetorical appeals does the writer employ? Provide an example.

Time is not always change. time can also mean continuity, and it can mean keeping acknowledged truths in mind despite differences in circumstances. there is no better example of this in things fall apart than the retellings of the proverb about the bird named eneke, the language in both retellings is almost identical despite the length of time that has passed between their repetitions. in comparing the usages of the same proverb, achebe allows his readers to note the similarities and differences between the situations, and he them understand how this story can be applied to their own lives.

Who said this in of pride & prejudice, and what type of irony does it show? “you mistake me, my dear. i have a high respect for your nerves. they are my old friends. i have heard you mention them with consideration these twenty years at least.” a. mrs. bennet: situational irony b. mr. bingley: dramatic irony c. elizabeth: proverbial irony d. mr. bennet: verbal irony

Which piece of evidence best supports schlossers claim that meatpacking is most dangerous job in the united states