English, 05.06.2021 05:00, almasrim274

Counter Argument: What would be the main argument of the opposing side?
My argument is: People should attain the legal rights of adulthood at the age of 18 because that’s when our minds can start developing, especially with more responsibilities and new experiences.
But what could be a counter-argument to mine?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

answered: user20061024

Your argument: People should attain the legal rights of adulthood at the age of 18 because that’s when our minds can start developing, especially with more responsibilities and new experiences.

(Pretend I am your opponent) Me: Yes, at the age of 18 you probably do get more responsible. But, a lot of minors are out there in the world knowing that these people are making the wrong choice. They should be able to take part too. Adding on, life is all about learing to push harder and keep on going. People make mistakes and as a person myself I definetly make a lot of mistakes. But, what if kids were able to learn at a young age. Of course they might make mistakes. Nontheless, that is what life is. If there are to be any trouble the goverment would be able to just stop it, so there is no harm done. Yes, my oppenent has a point, but to make this world better kids should be able to learn from their mistakes. To know what is wrong and what is right. That will lead out next generation to be better and better as it goes on.

answered: noahmoritz2004

Counter argument:

Yes, at the age of 18 you probably do get more responsible. But, a lot of minors are out there in the world knowing that these people are making the wrong choice.

They should be able to take part too. Adding on, life is all about learing to push harder and keep on going.

People make mistakes and as a person myself I definetly make a lot of mistakes. But, what if kids were able to learn at a young age. Of course they might make mistakes.

Non the less, that is what life is. If there are to be any trouble the goverment would be able to just stop it, so there is no harm done.

Yes, my oppenent has a point, but to make this world better kids should be able to learn from their mistakes. To know what is wrong and what is right. That will lead out next generation to be better and better as it goes on.

answered: Guest

600 dollars if i'm not mistaken.

answered: Guest

can you copy and paste what selections you read? the answer is based off of that.

Other questions on the subject: English

English, 22.06.2019 06:00, sabahfayaskhan

The author’s purpose for including this in the introduction is

Answers: 1

continue

English, 22.06.2019 07:30, zafarm2oxgpmx

Based on the explanation of the creation of natural elements, what might the modern-day iroquois culture value? conflicts material goods the environmen

Answers: 1

continue

English, 22.06.2019 12:00, ohgeezy

Which sentence is an example of first person narration? a. guess where i'm going? martin's sister said as she ran out of the house. b. where are you going? i asked my sister as she ran out of the house. c. where are you going? you ask your sister as she runs out of the house. d. where are you going? martin asked his sister as she runs of the house.

Answers: 2

continue

English, 22.06.2019 17:00, waterborn7152

0) "you're not here to read books, you're here to learn! " the childwrangler's voice screeched as we kept our picks moving rhythmically against the school walls. we had all heard about a time, back in the dark ages, when children read books at school. they say school was even a building above ground. but that was obviously dangerous. how could society thrive if the children sat around reading all day? when would they have time to learn about veins of coal, support structures, processing fuel, and all that stuff? school was important. which two central ideas in this story are most closely related?

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Counter Argument: What would be the main argument of the opposing side?
My argument is: People...