Construct a multi-paragraph written response in which you determine a shared purpose in the speeches of Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, and compare the way that each develops that purpose. Your response must be based on ideas that can be found in the speeches. ​Manage your time carefully so that you can:
​review the passages:
plan your response;
write a thorough response; and
revise and edit your response.
Be sure to.
​ include an introduction.
use evidence from the passages to support your explanation. and
include a conclusion.
Write your multi-paragraph response in the space provided.

How does visiting the place of the gods affect the narrator? a. he discovers that it is unwise to have an inquiring mind b. he learns that there is nothing supernatural to fear in the destroyed city c. he renounces everything he learned from the priests and his father d. he understands that the past has nothing of interest for people of the present

There is nothing miniscule about our --let alone our universe.

Directions: in 2 - 3 paragraphs respond to mack's idea about the "interplay of life and literature" in lines 92 - 100 in " why read shakespeare". 1. explain what it means to say that finding meaning in shakespeare "is a sort of proving ground for finding beauty and meaning in life". provide reasons that support your claim. 2. explain which is more important - that literature teaches readers about life or that understanding life readers understand literature. identify examples from literature you have read. 3. summarize your view of the interplay between literature and your own lives, explaining whether you see a connection or not and why.