How does the following statement in the Declaration of Independence support the conclusion that America must form its own government?
“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces (reveals) a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.”

A). It creates a list of evils committed by the British under the rule of king George lll.

B). It argues that Americans are naturally democratic; their spirit cannot tolerate tyranny.

C). It appeals to a widely excepted and well-known moral code.

D). It suggest the Americans are obligated to break from tyranny of the king.

The correct answer is D. It suggest the Americans are obligated to break from tyranny of the king.

Explanation

According to the previous statement, it can be established that the statement suggests that Americans are obliged to break with the king's tyranny by saying that “when a long train of abuses and usurpations, invariably pursuing the same object evinces (reveals) a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security" From the above, Because before the declaration of independence of the United States, the British took advantage of their power in the government to impose high taxes and unfavorable conditions for the colonists. So, it can be inferred that the correct answer is D. It suggest the Americans are obligated to break from tyranny of the king.

write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrators’ schools and explain how their schools shape their perspectives toward the hijab. cite evidence from the text to support your ideas.

copy and paste answer:

two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrator's schools would be this, the one school with the veil is the one school were the students were forced to wear the veils, and they did not know why they had to wear the veils. the girl student writing the story was not like the other students, she didn't care. in the second school there was a lot of hostile activities going on throughout the school. most of the students were upset and this, including the author, but she was trying to look and the good side of things.  

overall, both schools had something that the students or most of the students did not like or appreciate. what you can learn from these stories is that life will never be exactly how you may want it to be. complaining about your lifestyle will only make matters worse or at least feel worse in the long run. that's happens to be the information you can interpret from these two stories.