An accident again changed the current of my ideas. When I was about fifteen years old we had retired to our house near Belrive, when we witnessed a most violent and terrible thunderstorm. It advanced from behind the mountains of Jura, and the thunder burst at once with frightful loudness from various quarters of the heavens. I remained, while the storm lasted, watching its progress with curiosity and delight. As I stood at the door, on a sudden I beheld a stream of fire issue from an old and beautiful oak which stood about twenty yards from our house; and so soon as the dazzling light vanished, the oak had disappeared, and nothing remained but a blasted stump. When we visited it the next morning, we found the tree shattered in a singular manner. It was not splintered by the shock, but entirely reduced to thin ribbons of wood. I never beheld anything so utterly destroyed. Which character has the author decided to focus on for the telling of this story

Victor Frankenstein

Explanation:

This excerpt is narrated by Victor Frankenstein and shows the experience he had in observing the power of a storm and lightning over the material. This was a very important moment in Victor's life, because it gave him the idea of creating a living being through dead material, in addition to showing him the power that lightning has, this element being what he needed to obtain enough energy to create it quickly.

This moment was so important in Victor's life, that the author decided to use him as the main character at this point in the narrative, since this is a very influential point not only in Victor's life, but throughout the story.

This is an excerpt from the book "Frankenstein" written by Mary Shelley, where the story is told of how the scientist Victor Frankenstein managed to create a living being from pieces of dead bodies.

paine is arguying that they had tried everything before coming to the conclusion that they needed to fight for their freedom.

argument: "every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual."

claim 1: "our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of europe absolute."

claim 2: "wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for god’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child."

hello, answer is ready

answer: kim jong un.