Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide In your opinion, should anything be added or taken out of the “Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”? Cite evidence from this text, your own experience, and other literature, art, or history in your answer.

i think there should be answer choices

        its hard for some people to get along and that’s the case for douglass and canot. most of the time when people do not agree with each other its because they have different presperctives, and that is the case here.

captain canot was never a slave so but he was a slaver and a slave ship captain and just like the slave master's he tought it was it was totally normal, he used captain conot is a cruel man who enjoys whipping slaves but never   got whipped he saw it has a destiny for the slave to be a slave and the slaver to be a slaver   but douglass has suffered whoppings cut   even for no reason sometimes. douglass believed that slavery was not natural to black people, they need to study and learn how to read and write. he knew they have rights.

it was really not the captain’s fault he was just brainwashed by the system and when your brainwashed by the system its hard not to be brainwashed. but the reason douglass wants this is because he has suffered he knows how it feels and will do anything to stop that.

the answer is both an appeal to ethos and logos (if that's what your question options were)