Which best describes the author's attitude in the passage? 1. frustrated, because our understanding of the atom is so limited
2. smug, because our understanding of the atom has progressed significantly
3. hopeful, because our understanding of the atom is advancing
4. satisfied, because our understanding of the atom is complete

3. Hopeful, because our understanding of the atom is advancing.

Explanation:

The attitude of a writer refers to the tone that is used by the writer in narrating or writing the text. This means that specific words are used by writers to reveal their tone, their attitude, the feelings towards the topic.

In the given passage, the author delves into how our understanding of atoms has developed from ancient times to what we now know. And in stating that "thanks to these scientists and others, our understanding of the atom is more complex than it ever was, and it continues to evolve and change." This line shows that the writer's tone is hopeful. The use of words such as "evolve, change" reveals the hopeful tone of the writer.

Thus, the correct answer is option 3.

3. Hopeful, because our understanding of the atom is advancing.

Explanation:

Good Luck!

- "the die is cast; i have consented to return if we are not destroyed. thus are my hopes blasted by cowardice and indecision; i come back ignorant and disappointed. it requires more philosophy than i possess to bear this injustice with patience. i have lost my hopes of utility and glory; i have lost my friend."

with mrs. linde, nora reveals her insensitivity and lack of shame about the forgery she committed. she implies that mrs. linde has obviously aged since they last met 10 years earlier, which accounts for nora’s inability to recognize her old friend. although nora seems sympathetic to mrs. linde’s plight, she can’t seem to control herself from boasting about her three children, her husband’s recent promotion, and how good she feels to finally have some money to spend. in a way, she seems to be flaunting her good fortune in front of mrs. linde who, deprived of all these benefits, has come to ask nora for . it is also through her interactions with mrs. linde that we realize something deeper lies under nora’s seemingly childish exterior. she reveals the secret of her forgery to mrs. linde and seems to see herself as quite resourceful for having done it.

in the company of dr. rank, nora is freer than she is with her own husband. she openly laughs with joy at knowing that all the other bank employees will be under her husband’s control. she offers dr. rank a macaroon, apparently forgetting that he knows she is forbidden to eat them. she then quickly covers for herself by claiming that mrs. linde brought them. nora seems much more assertive and free with these other characters, as well as unabashedly willing to scheme, lie, and justify her transgressions as altruistic.  

krogstad provides an interesting parallel to nora. like nora, he too is guilty of committing forgery, for which torvald condemns him and decides to fire him. although krogstad is a man and nora a woman, their crimes of forgery unite them. in fact, krogstad might represent what nora would be like if she were a man and were not strictly scrupulous like her husband is. for example, she tells mrs. linde that "a barrister's profession is such an uncertain thing, especially if he won't undertake unsavoury cases; and naturally torvald has never been willing to do that." perhaps nora would have delved into the unsavory, given how opposite she is to her husband. krogstad's is also the only harsh voice of reality that nora is forced to hear, and that is because he blackmails her for her regaining his job at the bank. finally, torvald’s reaction to krogstad’s forgery seems to foreshadow his harsh and cold reaction to nora’s forgery.