Can someone give me the answer to this question?Williams's poem and Brueghel's painting share the same subject. In your opinion, which creates a more powerful emotional response in the reader or
viewer? Provide at least two pieces of evidence to support your argument,
establishing reasons for your claims. Explain why you have chosen the poem
or the painting, and why the other is less powerful. Use specific details from
the poem and the painting to support your arguments. (15 points)

sight: watching a movie

touch: petting a dog

smell: smelling dinner

hearing: listening to music

taste: eating pizza

the red coloration of the lungs looks alarming and adds to the overall message that the flu is threatening apex

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest