English
English, 05.05.2021 19:50, rina62

PLSS HELP GIVING BRAINLIEST A local activist group has proposed that all owners of cats and dogs should be required to get microchips for their animals so that they can be identified if they run away. The activists argue that this would promote animal welfare and avoid the problem of nuisance animals. Under this proposal, you would have to pay a fine if you failed to microchip your pet. Do you agree that all pets should have microchips? Write a statement either supporting or opposing the idea and giving reasons for your choice. Which claim most appropriately responds to the requirements of the prompt? A. While the activists are acting on good motivations such as a love of animals, the microchip proposal goes too far and should not be enacted. B. Microchips are small electronic devices that are implanted under the skin of animals and contain identifying information, such as contact information for the owner. C. Microchips should not be required for all pets, because people should be able to decide for themselves what is right for their animals. O D. Many pet owners do not want to microchip their animals and see no need to do so, as their pets live only indoors and have no chance of getting lost.​

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 05:20, vero5047
Read the benefits of wind energy. which statement accurately evaluates the authors response to the counterclaim in paragraph 1, stating wind power is i ferior to fossil fuels as an energy source?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 16:20, jocelyngm
In which sentence is the underlined verb in the passive voice? noah’s little sister is being silly. hank has won first prize in the talent contest. she has been chosen to sing in tonight’s concert. we have been waiting for an hour.
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 16:30, yyyyyyyyy9462
Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? clearly, rainsford did not kill zaroff in self-defense. this statement, therefore, shows that rainsford killed zaroff in self-defense. so, rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. in the end, rainsford is not justified in killing zaroff.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 17:30, nailah742
Pick two parallel characters from these chapters and describe how comparing them reveals something significant about each.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
PLSS HELP GIVING BRAINLIEST A local activist group has proposed that all owners of cats and dogs s...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 06.10.2019 19:00
Konu
History, 06.10.2019 19:00