Keisha is writing a research paper on the dangers of distracted driving for her social studies class. she is allowed to use two websites for her sources but one must provide factual data and research information. she finds a website set up by a mother whose son was killed in a car accident by another driver who was texting and driving. keisha locates the author's name on the website, and the site looks professional. however, the mother not only calls the other driver names, but also says that the other driver's parents did not raise him right. should she use this website as a source of factual evidence? why? a. yes, she should use the site because it will be a good resource against the distracted driver argument. b. no, she should not use the site because people who have been directly affected by something are too close to it to be objective and offer neutral facts. c. no, she should look for a website that focuses on the facts and data surrounding this issue as her fact resource. she may choose to use other information from this site for other aspects of her paper. d. yes, she should use the site because it is a credible resource. distracted drivers are terrible people, and they need to be stopped!

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

the illustration   that would give a reader a clear understanding of the text is a picture of men constructing the frame of a building.the frame is made of iron bars. the text describes the job of blacksmiths'. these were very organised and they had different names: "the driver" and "the heater". the text describes the way in which these men worked ; they worked iron pieces as if they were playing a sport. in fact, the text wants to show the men's skills. the text also puts some emphasis on the use of '' rivets'' in construction. this kind of nails were not always used in the construction of manhattan.

some examples:

"and with an underhand toss he hurled the smoking rivet straight at the catcher, who caught it in mid-air in his catching can." men's skills

"when the driver was ready for a new " the emphasis on the rivet ( special nail used in construction).

" it against a beam to remove any cinders, and jammed it into the waiting hole. " the emphasis on the rivet.