Akey difference between the annotated bibliography and the works cited page is that the annotated bibliography each source.
a. summarizes, assess, and reflects on
b. lists only the author and page number of
c. includes a photocopy or screenshot of
d. provides in-text citations for

The correct answer is A. Summarizes, asses, and reflects on each source

Explanation:

In academical wring, a "works cited page" is a page placed at the end of a document or text that organizes alphabetically key information about the sources that were cited during the text including the name of the author of the source, the date it was published and other details such as the city of publication, publisher, web location depending on the type of source, which are only mentioned and organized according to style manuals.

On the other hand, an annotated bibliography refers to a document itself, in which the author does not only mention the details about the source but summarizes, analyzes, asses, evaluates and even reflects about the content of the source and can include  a description of the main topic and argument of the source, the organization of the source, the scope, and purpose of the work, the strengths, and weaknesses of the source, among others.

Considering this, it can be concluded a difference between the annotated bibliography and the works cited page is that the annotated bibliography "summarizes, assess, and reflects on" each source, while the works cited page only mentions the information required to locate the source.

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.

are you asking for advice? if so, i think its great! i like how you gave specific details. i think you will get a good grade on it!