Thesis: the benefits of exploring space justify the high cost.

counter-argument: the money spent on exploring space would do more good people here on earth.

which of these is the best response to this counter-argument?
a. we don't spend money wisely when we people on earth, so let's use that money for space instead.
b. we already spend enough money people here on earth
c. if we explore space, we'll learn more about science and be better able to people here on earth.
d. people would rather invest money in something that will guarantee huge returns, such as space exploration.

we would need to be able to read the passage in question to determine which factor allowed david believe he could defeat goliath. post the passage, and i'd love to out.

the best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice.

the sentences  articulate the philosophical concept of altruism.

i hope my answer has come to your . you for posting your question here in we hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. have a nice day ahead!

read more on -

the answer is "the man who came here yesterday was selling magazines."

it'd be the heavy rain and the town council, or b and d.