Select the mistake responsible for the faulty reasoning in the following statement. i'm bringing my blue fountain pen to the speech contest; i never forget my speech when i have my pen. thinking that a causes b because a always comes before b mistaking an effect for a cause oversimplifying the cause no fallacy

thinking that A causes B because A always comes before B

Explanation:

The pen(A) has been a constant thing (always there) before every positive speech (B), so the logical line that the writer follows, is that the pen has to be there in order for a correct speech to be given, even though no direct relation is implied or stated between the blue pen and a good speech.

i would like to compare these two interpretations of the crucible : 1) eric christ's interretation and wade bradford's interpretation. the main differences between there interretaions is that in the first one you can notice direct link to joseph mccarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria.the second interpretation shows that author believes that the story   about puritan town in salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sencible reference to sort of bias.

yes you could be a life guard if that the question.