If a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding discussion of the vietnam conflict, or the expression by any student of opposition to it anywhere on school property except as part of a prescribed classroom exercise, it would be obvious that the regulation would violate the constitutional rights of students.
what is the reasoning in this argument?
a. if students were kept from discussing vietnam in school, it would be an obvious violation of their rights, so not allowing them to wear armbands also violates their rights.
b. if students were forbidden to express opinions about vietnam in school, it would be an obvious violation of their rights, so we might as well forbid armbands as well.
c. if students can only discuss vietnam during a class activity, then they can only be allowed to wear armbands during that activity.
d. if students can only talk about vietnam during a classroom exercise, then they should be allowed to wear armbands when not in the classroom.

Me asap it's an e2020 test and it's timedread the rough draft of a student's conclusion to anargumentative editorial.(1) year-round schooling would student achievement.(2) not so much information would have to be crammed intonine months. (3) furthermore, the elimination of long breaks, particularly summer break, would significantly reduce"learning loss" and the additional time wasted at thebeginning of each academic year to reteach previouslylearned material. (4) it is clear that year-round schooling students learn and retain more. (5) the united statesis not the only country to experiment with a year-roundschool schedule. (6) although many still claim that evidenceabout year-round school and its link to higher achievement isinconclusive, these people need to open their eyes and seethat students in these schools consistently score higher oncertain assessments than students who attend schools withtraditional nine-month calendars. (7) it is about time that wereplaced our outdated and inefficient school calendars. what revision would most strengthen sentence 1?