What was the conflict between julius caesar, how was it resolved?

25 points. i need this answered now, 1 paragraph needs to be about the conflict, the second paragraph has to be about the resolving. hurry, you

Brutus and Cassius quarrel. Brutus accuses Cassius of having an itching palm which means he has taken some bribe in place of homage to power. Cassius is heartbroken to think that his dear friend Brutus is angry with him.

During the quarrel, the truth of Brutus' bad temperament is revealed. His precious Portia is dead. She has swallowed hot coals and killed herself.

Brutus has lost the most precious gift in his life. He has lost his beloved wife. He has no will to go on. He might as well be dead along with Portia. Through his grief, Cassius' faults are magnified. After much discourse, quarreling, Brutus admits his reason for being so indignant.

Cassius realizes that Brutus is commenting out of anger, hurt, and bereavement at losing his wife.

Brutus decides to put his anger aside and offers Cassius wine. The two share wine and a handshake. In the face of death, the two breach their divisions.

Cassius and Brutus have argued out of fear and grief. They reunite due to the fact that they are in this situation due to honorable qualities. They both desire that Rome 's countrymen be free from slavery.

Caesar had to die. Now Brutus and Cassius face death for protecting Rome from Caesar's ambition.

Brutus could resent Cassius for persuading him to take action against Caesar.

Was Caesar's death in vain? Will Brutus and Cassius lose the war? In death, Brutus and Cassius have reunited.

he or she may have a different tone of feelings.

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).