When the fashion critics witness the unveiling of the designer's latest line of shoes, they will shower her with much deserved praise; she will be named the shoe heiress.
identify the sentence type.
independent clause
compound sentence
complex sentence
compound-complex sentence

Compound-complex sentence

Further Explanation:

Compound-Complex sentences are known to be the most complicated sentences and contain two independent clauses. An independent clause is a clause in which a sentence makes its formation by itself while a dependent clause cannot. Compound-Complex sentences are the ones that help us to express thoughts that are longer and more complicated as compared to the other sentences.  

Compound-complex sentences work in a good way in order to explain ideas that are in general complicated to describe. One example of a compound-complex sentence is - 'Kate doesn't like cartoons because they are loud, so she doesn't watch them'. The above statement contains two independent clauses and one dependent clause. The dependent clause 'because they are loud' does not stands on its own as a complete sentence and the dependent clauses from the example are 'Kate doesn't like cartoons' and 'she doesn't watch them' as both these are complete sentences on their own form.  

Learn More:

1. Which of the following events occurred on the Italian mainland as allied forces moved across the island of Sicily during the summer of 1943?

2. Which one of the following is true about employer responsibility in providing fall protection to workers?

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Compound-Complex sentences

Subject: English

Keywords: Compound sentences, complex sentences, compound-complex sentences, dependent clause, independent clause, complicated, express.  

what novel are you talking about?

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this