English
English, 03.02.2020 07:52, mine9226

Asap
read the passage.

excerpt from how to behave: a pocket manual of republican etiquette by samuel r. wells

american children (we are sorry to be obliged to say it) are not, as a general rule, well behaved. they are rude and disrespectful, if not disobedient. . through whose fault comes this state of things? american boys and girls have naturally as much good sense and good-nature as those of any other nation, and, when well trained, no children are more courteous and agreeable. the fault lies in their education. in the days of our grandfathers, children were taught manners at school; a rather rude, backwoods sort of manners, it is true, but better than the no manners at all of the present day. we must blame parents in this matter rather than their children. if you would have your children grow up beloved and respected by their elders as well as their contemporaries, teach them good manners in their childhood. the young sovereign should first learn to obey, that he may be the better fitted to command in his turn.

which statement from the excerpt uses fallacious reasoning?

a."the young sovereign should first learn to obey, that he may be the better fitted to command in his turn," because the author is applying the behavior of one to the behavior of all.

b."american children (we are sorry to be obliged to say it) are not, as a general rule, well behaved," because it is an argument based purely on emotion.

c."american children (we are sorry to be obliged to say it) are not, as a general rule, well behaved," because if the author must apologize for a statement, it should not be included.

d."the young sovereign should first learn to obey, that he may be the better fitted to command in his turn," because although this statement sounds reasonable, the author provides no support for it.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 23:30, Jsusussueususu
Buck did not cry out. he did not check himself, but drove in upon spitz, shoulder to shoulder, so hard that he missed the throat. they rolled over and over in the powdery snow. spitz gained his feet almost as though he had not been overthrown, slashing buck down the shoulder and leaping clear. twice his teeth clipped together, like the steel jaws of a trap, as he backed away for better footing, with lean and lifting lips that writhed and snarled. read this passage. explain what the conflict shows about buck and spitz.
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:30, noelmusulin1
Based on the information in the passage, what conclusion can the reader make?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 03:20, lasardia
Which of these events inspired many of stephen crane’s writings, including the story “an episode of war”?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 10:30, manaisialockhart12
Read the excerpt from "object lesson, part 2." "no sign of the original envelope? " "no." "i found two boys with bills — in each case a single, too. david strager and joey buell. no envelope." louise's brows met. ellery glanced up at the clock. 9: 07. he strolled over to her. "don't show them you're worried. there's nothing to worry about. we have twenty-eight minutes." he raised his voice, smiling. which statement explains the inference ellery makes and why he makes it? he infers that miss carpenter thinks they are not going to find the thief because he sees her facial expression. he infers that it will take twenty-eight more minutes to find the missing money because that is all the time he has. he infers that the original envelope will not be found because neither david strager nor joey buell has it. he infers that david strager and joey buell took the money because they each have a dollar bill.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Asap
read the passage.

excerpt from how to behave: a pocket manual of republican...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 09.05.2021 18:50