In a group discussion, which statement most clearly uses evidence to support a conclusion? a. the author makes some good points, but i feel that he's ultimately biased. b. the author obviously hates the way fast food tastes, which is why he's negative. c. the author proves that he's biased when he uses terms like ''silly'' and "stupid". d. the author first criticizes fast food, and then goes on criticize junk food

Option c. the author proves that he's biased when he uses terms like ''silly'' and "stupid".

Explanation:

A conclusion is a recap of the main idea in a paper. It basically summarizes the content of the paper. In addition, the conclusion points readers back to the main idea as the reader is reading the paper. In this instance, the correct conclusion is drawn from option C where the passage uses the words quoted in the text.

the two answers are

get thee back into the tempest and the night's plutonian shore

on the pallid bust of pallas just above my chamber door

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)