A. the brown case addresses whether the plaintiff has been deprived of liberty, or freedom, as a result of attending segregated schools.
b. the brown case addresses whether the plaintiff’s property has been placed in jeopardy while attending segregated schools.
c. the brown case addresses whether the plaintiff has been denied due process of law while attempting to attend public schools.
d. the brown case addresses whether the plaintiff has been afforded equal protection of the laws relative to those attending public schools.

If you had a chance to change the past would you? why or why not?

Read the excerpt from part 3 of the call of the wild. but it was in giving the law and making his mates live up to it, that buck excelled. dave and sol-leks did not mind the change in leadership. it was none of their business. their business was to toil, and toil mightily, in the traces. so long as that were not interfered with, they did not care what happened. billee, the good-natured, could lead for all they cared, so long as he kept order. the rest of the team, however, had grown unruly during the last days of spitz, and their surprise was great now that buck proceeded to lick them into shape. what theme is most supported by the ideas in this excerpt? good leaders are strong and intelligent. loyalty can be a very powerful force. only the strong survive in the wilderness. we are all ruled by our natural instincts.

Which traits are strongest in your persuasive essay: ideas, organization, voice, word choice, sentence fluency, or conventions?