PLEASE HELP!! Now, consider the differences between these works. Authors often transform other works of literature to make them more realistic, relatable, or interesting to a modern audience.

In one paragraph, answer these questions:

What is at least one way that Shakespeare transformed the plot, setting, or characters from the Roman myth “Pyramus and Thisbe”?
Why you think Shakespeare transformed the story in this way?

what are your options ?

i would say years or cherry blossoms

hello, never fear the humanspider is here!

answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.

it's likely the answer would be c.

- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.

- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.

- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.

**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**

note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!

~

your friendly neighborhood human spider.

the word that best matches the meaning of the expression "went to the big ocean" is died.

the goldfish died, which is why the father looks at the children mournfully. the "big ocean" is the father's way of saying fish heaven. he could have just said that the goldfish died, but this way, the children imagine the fish in a bigger, better place instead of just picturing a dead fish.

explanation:

i will have to go with 1.

hope this !