Reread the following lines from Act 3 Scene 2: Juliet O serpent heart hid with a flowering face! Did ever dragon keep so fair a cave? Beautiful tyrant, fiend angelical, Dove-feathered raven, wolvish-ravening lamb, Despised substance of divinest show, Just opposite to what thou justly seemest, A d*mned saint, an honourable villain. O nature, what hadst thou to do in he** In this passage, Juliet uses paired opposites to express her horror at the news that Romeo killed Tybalt. Which of the following lines features a similiar use of paired opposites from elsewhere in the play? (the use of indicates the end of a line).

A. "O bawling love, O loving hate / O anything of nothing first created / O heavy lightness, serious vanity;" Act 1 Scene 1 lines 171-173

B. "I'll go along no such sight to be shown, / Bur to rejoice in splendor of mine own" Act 1 Scene 2 lines 103-104

C. "But my true love has frown to such excess, / I cannor sum up sum of half my wealth" Act 2 Scene 6 Lines 33-34

D. Come, come, thou art as hot a jack in thy modd as / anyone in Italy; and as soon moved to be moody, and as 500 Act 3 scene i Lines 11-12 mestion 2017​

163)nick said to his mom that he will kill himself

164)she said that honey was sweet

165)nick joked that he called it chicken drumsticks

166)mick said that he totally loved the english premier league

167)nick said that she was amazing

168)nick asked if you were going to finish strong

169) socrates asked that what he wanted the most when he was there

170)murthy said to anna that she had passed the exam

171)he said that he wanted to join it

172)he asked if i have seen the accident

173)the doctor requested to take rest for a week

hope this will

#faaz

&

messi

i think that will have something to do with the mississippi river but google will know the full answer for sure

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this