Hey everyone! Today I have to write an essay about using controlled fires to protect wild areas... I have to pick a side ( for/ against) But I dont know which one. What do you think?
Tysm If you answer!
Have a nice day ♥

i agree with that because it could help protect wild areas! :)

here's my answer if u want just a sample Lineth , it's fine if I'm too late

Explanation:

fires can be used to protect the wilds..but in the other hand. Fires can also cause world pollution which is contamination of the air in the environment. They can be either be something good or bad. But I go for bad becz the air we breath is contaminated and it will affect our breathing and it will also cause the depletion of the atmospheric layers of the earth...

Hope dis helps ya . this is just for ur understanding .

no need for thanks! Just had to do when a frnd needs ur help eventually I'm already late (LMA.o)

the sentence does not violate the phrase structure second rule (introduced by noam chomsky) because noun phrases consist of a determiner such as a, the or every, and a noun. in the sentence, the noun phrase the cake includes a determiner (the) and a noun (cake).

on the other hand, the first rule indicates that a sentence encloses a noun phrase, followed by a verb phrase. the example sentence can be analysed as follows:

john (n) + ate (v) + the (det) + cake (n).

excuse me but there is no picture or question showed in this problem.