TASK: In a one-paragraph response, analyze how Sojourner Truth uses one rhetorical device to shape, or develop, her argument in her speech “Ain’t I a Woman.” Follow the steps in the “Short Response Writing” Slide. Complete the Quick Check activities and then write your short response on page 2 of this document.

Short Response Writing: You can remember how to write a short response using the ABCD Format: For short answer response questions, it is important to first clearly state your thesis, or Answer. Next, provide relevant Background details about the text you are analyzing. Then Cite evidence to support your thesis. Lastly, Discuss and Explain the importance of this evidence and how it proves your answer.

A – ANSWER: Restate the question into a statement and give a straightforward answer. You must clearly express your argument, claim, or position on the question.
Avoid the following words or phrases in your conclusion: “I think/believe,” ”maybe,” or “probably.”
B – BACKGROUND: Briefly introduce relevant details about the text. Also, consider any important details about the speaker or the occasion. Do NOT summarize the entire text. Rather, focus on the main connections or parts of the text you analyzed in order to draw your conclusion.
Sentence Starters: Over the course of the speech... OR In the speech.. OR The speaker...
C - CITE EVIDENCE: Use relevant textual evidence which supports your thesis (Answer). Your evidence should include the writing strategy you are analyzing and prove how you reached your answer.
Sentence Starters: According to the text, “(QUOTE).” OR The author states, “(QUOTE).”
D – DISCUSS & EXPLAIN FURTHER: Clarify and elaborate on how your evidence supports your answer. First focus on what the evidence means, or reveals, but more importantly, why it matters. Discuss how and why the evidence is significant to proving your conclusion.
Sentence Starters: This example of (writing strategy) demonstrates… OR This example of (writing strategy) reveals how… OR The author is suggesting… OR This is significant because…

a i thinkmark me brainliest

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this

the question is the text structure of this passage is. a. chronological order. b. problem and solution. c. cause and effect. d. compare and contrast.