In your estimation, which argument—Point or Counterpoint—won the debate in the selection “De-Extinction: The Science and Ethics of Bringing Lost Species Back to Life”? In a structured argument of approximately one page, explain why you think either the Point or the Counterpoint argument is more successful than the other. Make sure to address the amount and relevance of the evidence in each essay, as well as the overall validity of the reasoning in both arguments and whether or not they contain any fallacious reasoning. In what way did the more successful argument best use text structure and persuasive techniques to help organize and enhance its claims? Cite specific passages from both the Point and the Counterpoint sides of the de-extinction debate as evidence for your evaluation.

ha ahahahahah ahaha hah ha hahah ah ahahahahahaha ha ha haha a haha im a tro

gilgamesh is a hero by birth as the epic explains it. in the epic the birth is explained in the way which tells us that gilgamesh’s creation was made perfect by the contribution of various god and that signifies the goal in his life, which was to become a hero and save mankind. an example from the text says. "the glorious sun shamash bestowed upon him glory; adad the terrible god of storms bestowed upon him courage. the great gods perfected his magnificence beyond all others, terrible like the great wild bull. two thirds god they made him; one third man they made him." a man born with superhuman qualities and partly god is destined to be a hero.

the heroic deeds carried by him later in his life also prove the heroic character of gilgamesh. for example hi battle with the ultimate beast humbaba is a proof of his bravery and characteristic heroism. gilgamesh was warned about the beast as the text says about humbaba “whose roar is a flood, whose mouth is fire, whose breath is death". but with the superhuman strength gilgamesh did the job