How does the author develop her argument regarding burning trees? Justify your response with evidence from the text. Using the article Surprise! Fire can help some forests keep more of their water

The author of the article starts by saying that although it is believed that fires are bad, they are not actually bad: "In forests, abundant trees are good and fire is bad, right? Actually, the reverse can be true".

Then, she starts explaining why with her own words and explaining some processes, but after that she starts quoting different people who can explain why fire can help some forests keep more of their water and using scientific studies: "Some forest managers actually start fires to burn off those thirsty understory trees and brush. These fires are known as “controlled burns.” Researchers choose where, when and how much forest to burn so that it can be done safely and in a way that will improve forest health."

Explanation:

To complete this exercise, you have to read the article "Surprise! Fire can help some forests keep more of their water" and then answer the question. This is a short article that explains what evapotranspiration is and how fires affect water in forests, specially in California’s Sierra Nevada Mountains.

i do not know what the passage is but i can give some examples

1. repetitive phrases may be used to create a emphasizing tone

2. pauses in sentences are used to create a dramatic effect but can also be suspenseful

3. using lots of exclamation marks and loud speech such as words in all caps can be creating a excited or possibly angry tone.

4. using lots of questioning phrases my mean that they are in suspicion of something.

5. using lots of questionable statements or questions can imply of a sneeky or sly tone.

is it multiple