English
English, 02.03.2021 20:20, hayden6920

How do the author of the two texts differ in how they view the future of artificial blood? А A
a
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood' explains the health risks
associated with artificial blood using hemoglobin, while the author of "Blood. There is
No Substitute' only refers to the immediate results from testing the artificial blood in
humans
B
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" is uncertain about the widespread
use of artificial blood to help patients in need, while the author of "Blood: There Is No
Substitute is doubtful that artificial blood will ever be an effective substitute for human
blood
to human blood. And they
Blood
y your doctor enter the operating
an in New York Citit just that is
want out if he couleure her by
What the patient survived, but not all
Mowe dan some doctors thought milk
1000 Over the centuries, doctors
sheep blood, and even urine. Such
nero
se who have lost a great deal of blood
on Medical staff transfer blood
bod is often in short supply
citie individuals
tes similar to real human
msicker. If scientists succeed,
has turned out to be trickler than
С
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" describes the promise of an
artificial blood substitute approved to treat patients, while the author of "Blood: There is
No Substitute' believes that improvements are necessary before an artificial blood
substitute can be given to patients
D
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" believes that the U. S. Food and
Drug Administration will expand approval of blood transfusions using artificial blood,
while the author of "Blood: There Is No Substituto believes that the U. S. Food and Drug
Administration will continue to prohibit the use of blood transfusions from artificial blood.
N
!
as that blood has in our bodies

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 17:00, griffin27298
Read the following passage "you're not here to read books, you're here to learn! " the childwrangler's voice screeched as we kept our picks moving rhythmically against the school walls. we had all heard about a time, back in the dark ages, when children read books at school. they say school was even a building above ground. but that was obviously dangerous. how could society thrive if all the children sat around reading all day? when would they have time to learn about veins of coal, processing fuel, and all that stuff? school was important. what two central ideas in this story are most closely related? a. the importance of literature and the dangers of miningb. humankind's basic survival needs and independence c. the nature of learning and societal dysfunctiond. the powers of rumors and abuse of authority
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 20:00, anatomyfl
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. match the audience to the description of each speech.
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 21:50, romanbattistelli23
They always say that juvenile delinquency is a problem. a.)them b.)everyone c.)a noun
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 23:00, ruchiamin2633
In the sentence above, which verb is the irregular verb? a. laid b. warmed c. removed d. walked
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
How do the author of the two texts differ in how they view the future of artificial blood? А A

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
French, 20.10.2020 04:01