HI, just write a attention grabber sentence for this passage. Essay must be formal in tone, which means: *third person pronouns only (NO: you or your) (NO: we, I, me, or us)
*no contractions
*no slang terms
The contest challenge was to create outrageous art from unconventional1
materials. The students in Eileen Farrelly-Moyotl’s 11th-grade fashion design class at
the High School of Art and Design in Manhattan were up to it: one of them made a
dress from plastic bags filled with floating fish.
“I thought it was the perfect contest for my class,” Ms. Farrelly-Moyotl said. “It
allows for creative problem solving and encourages students not to have limits. It also
lets them express their personalities.” She said the student fashioning the floating fish
dress originally wanted to use live fish, but that idea was quickly abandoned in favor
of the toy variety. Securing the bags so they don’t pop when the dress is worn,
however, remains a concern.
The contest, the Materials Matter Amazing Art Challenge, is a project of the
Ripley’s Believe It or Not Odditorium in Times Square, an 18,000-square-foot
attraction filled with exhibits . . . Though Ripley’s already organizes field trips with
local schools, Michael Hirsch, president and general manager of the Odditorium, said
he wanted to have a greater impact. “One of the core elements of Ripley’s is going to
the depths of your imagination,” he said. “We wanted a contest that would challenge
the minds of New York City art students.” . . .

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

thousands of people

explanation: