Which argument is supported by relevant evidence, and how? Argument 1:

Allowing kids to ride motorized scooters at age 14 will prepare them to become better drivers at age 16. Officer Grant of the Herman Police Department says, “Many minor accidents involving younger drivers are a simple matter of not knowing traffic rules.”

Argument 2:

Allowing kids to ride motorized scooters at age 14 will prepare them to become better drivers at age 16. Shirley Abbot, owner of Herman Auto Sales, says, “A motorized scooter only reaches 45 miles per hour, so they are not allowed on highways.”

A: Argument 1, because the example supports the claim that riding motorized scooters will make teens better drivers

B: Argument 2, because the example supports the claim that riding motorized scooters will make teens better drivers

C: Argument 2, because the example supports the claim that motorized scooters are not allowed on highways

D: Argument 1, because the example supports the claim that motorized scooters are not allowed on highways