English
English, 26.02.2021 19:10, heyrosaphoto2610

Read the excerpt from The Dark Game. Mr. H. quickly began talking to his contacts in the city. Soon he heard of a British printer in Mexico City who had been falsely arrested for printing counterfeit money. Mr. H. intervened with the British minister, who got the frightened printer released from custody and the charges against him dropped. The printer, overjoyed to be free, told Mr. H. that he would welcome the opportunity to repay the agent for his intervention. As a matter of fact, Mr. H. told him, there was a favor the printer could do for him.

Which inference can a reader make based on the information in the excerpt?

Mr. H. knew the printer would help them upon release from prison.
Mr. H. was very concerned for the falsely imprisoned printer.
Mr. H. and the printer had known each other for a long time.
Mr. H. originally had not intended to employ the printer’s help.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 17:30, johnLavender8798
Which piece of evidence would best support reason #1? othe history of using animals for research extends asfar back as 322 bce, when early greek physician-scientists, such as aristotle and erasistratus, performed various experiments on living animals. animal research played an essential role in thedevelopment of herceptin and tamoxifen, twomedications that have already saved the lives ofthousands of women who have been diagnosed withbreast cancer. even those who believe in testing on animals when it is hnecessary for vital medical research practice what isknown as "the 3 rs-reduction, refinement, andreplacement to reduce the number of animals usedfor testing. biologists believe that chimpanzees share at least 98.4percent of the same dna as humans and gorillas shareat least 97 percent, making primates a popular andlikely choice for the testing of products intended for humans
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 04:00, maribel234
Aspy novel would probably be a novel of
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:00, mjeliteballer
What is the missing statement in step 3 of the proof? given: z1 is complementary to 22. 22 is complementary to 23. prove: m_1 = m23 m21 = m2 m2 1 + m22 = 90° m22 = m23 m22 + m23 = 180° 2 statements 21 is comp. to 22 2. 22 is comp. to 23 3. ? 4. mz1 - 90°-m22 m22+m23 = 90° 6. m23 = 90°-m22 7 m21 - m23 reasons 1. given 2. given 3. def of comp. zs 4. subtr equality prop. 5. def. of comp. 25 6 subtr. equality prop 17. trans. prop. vo
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:50, heroxtree
Which of these best explains why the argument in this passage is weak? (5 points) the argument doesn't take into account opposing points of view. the argument relies on attacking a weak version of the opposition. the claim is not valid. the argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Read the excerpt from The Dark Game. Mr. H. quickly began talking to his contacts in the city. Soon...

Questions in other subjects: