Read the passages below and complete the instructions that follow. Argument's conclusion: Governments should legally ban restaurants from offering toys as an incentive to families
to buy food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium.

Counterargument: If the government educated parents about the health effects of food with high amounts of
sugar, fat, or sodium, then parents would not feed their kids food with high amounts of sugar, fat, sodium.

Rebuttal: Even if parents have the knowledge they need to make the right decision, it's difficult to do so if
restaurants can use marketing techniques such as popular toys to attract customers. Educating parents combined
with regulating restaurants can help families make healthier decisions.

Put the counterargument and rebuttal above into paragraph format. Add signal words to properly guide the reader.

Responses may vary but should include some or all of the following information:

Some argue that the ban is not necessary and that if the government educated parents about the health effects of food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium, then parents would not feed their kids food with high amounts of these unhealthy substances. Although the opposition has a point about the importance of education, even if parents have the knowledge they need to make the right decision, it’s difficult to do so if restaurants can use marketing techniques such as popular toys to attract customers. Educating parents combined with regulating restaurants can help families make healthier decisions.

Explanation:

hooch has about 3% alcohol content so the 5 gallon 90% platinum vodka would be stronger because it has a higher alcohol content then hooch.  

where are the answer choices?