Inspired many to non-violent forms of protest and resistance. He fought to end poverty, worked to expand women's right to and religious groups. Like Thoreau, he lived simply, owned very little, and ate a vegetarian diet. In India, Gandhi's form of
movement." He urged Indians to boycott British education systems and leave government jobs. The movement was very
British controlled government arrested him. After a few years, he was released and became active in politics again. He ins
protest various taxes. On one such march, thousands followed him 240 miles over 24 days to the sea to protest a salt tac
violent resistance to the government that others in the country followed. Eventually India won independence from Britain,
Gandhi's model of resistance and reform was creative, appealing, and successful. As a result, Dr. Martin Luther King look-
way to resist segregation in the South. The lunch counter protests, famous for the passive response to anger, and even
enforced by laws in some regions of the South. King also organized walks, marches, and bus rides that were meant to br
Americans. These forms of protest were directly modeled on Gandhi's, but King took them straight to the source of oppre
awareness and built momentum, King's protests were in the face of great hatred and fear. The passive, non-violent prote
because the passive response to violence cast the opposition as brutes. However, change came slowly and at the cost o
peaceful protest, however, until his death. King learned from Gandhi, expanding on what worked, applying old technique
philosophy, in part, to a New England poet who loved the woods.
Which of the following best explains how King's forms of protest built upon what Gandhi had done?
O King gave protesters an alternative to being arrested.
O King made Gandhi's model more confrontational
King taught people how to resist more passively than Gandhi.
O King required protesters to endure brutality unlike those of Gandhi.
vious Question

answer: i think it is saying that “the young man hopes she will be free. him escape signal him the door with the lady give him a ring run away with him.

explanation: i ask myself in my head and think and think until i found this

the emperor is made to look inferior next to faustus's power.

a you should do a lion because they are so majestic

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.