7. Sometimes I resent the fact that I have to give complicated answers to seemingly simple questions. At other times it all seems rather trivial: As I watch my nieces
and nephews growing up, and laying the basis of their identities among multiple
cultures, I cannot help but feel proud. What an amazing opportunity, to speak
multiple languages and see so many countries.
As a team:
Partner 2: Find the definition for the highlighted words.
Write them here:
Partner 3: Claim: Who or what is this paragraph about, and what are they doing?
Partner 4: Evidence: Highlight the evidence in green that best matches your claim
Partner 1: Reasoning: What does this show about the author?

do you have a photo of the paragraph?

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.