Which of the following is a restatement of thesis? Source 3 raises the questions, "Does this open the door to the government being able to regulate even the
most minute details of our lives? For example, will the government soon be able to regulate what kinds of
movies we're allowed to see in the theater, based on their arbitrary judgment of whether or not a film is
dangerous to our mental health?
Government regulation of what we eat and drink is not only fair but worthwhile.
The Clean Air Act of 1970 for example, was put in place to control air pollution on a national level, as well as
provide a healthier and cleaner living environment for the people of the United States of America.
The beneficial changes that these regulations would cause, outweighs the argument given by the opposition.
Government regulation of what we eat and drink is not only fair but worthwhile.

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”

What is the best statement about carl sandburg poetry?

How can an author reveal move information about a character