THIS IS ABOUT: BULLYING IN SCHOOLS. Of the two arguments, which do you think is less persuasive? Why? Explain your answer in a 250-word response. Remember to cite evidence from the text to support your answer. THIS IS ABOUT: BULLYING IN SCHOOLS.

Hello. Unfortunately it is not possible to have access to the text you entered in the question, for this reason, it will not be possible to offer an exact answer, but I will try to help you in the best possible way.

It is only possible to support two arguments, with the reading of the text. However, I can say that the least persuasive argument is one that offers less evidence, because it has less support and loses in reliability, becoming weaker and without persuasiveness.

the anwser is went creeping down the river again, across the wide lonely marshes to the sea.

i longed to go with them out into the world to seek my fortune in foreign lands—africa, india, china and peru!

and, dreaming of the lands i had never seen, i'd sit on there, watching till they were out of sight.

option 2

explanation: