English, 17.02.2021 09:40, jakepeavy70
Which claim best responds to the writing prompt?
Writing prompt:
In 1945, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the cities of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Some historians say that these
attacks ended the war. Other historians say that Japan would have
surrendered anyway. Do you think the dropping of atomic bombs was
justified? Support your reasoning.
A. The dropping of atomic bombs on Japan was justified because
there was no guarantee that Japan would have surrendered
otherwise.
B. Some historians think that millions more Americans and Japanese
would have died had the United States invaded Japan instead of
dropping the bombs.
C. Over 200,000 Japanese people were likely killed because of the
atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and many more
were wounded.
D. There are arguments for and against the dropping of atomic
bombs on Japan, and it is not clear if the United States was
justified in using such weapons.
Answers: 3
English, 22.06.2019 10:00, ultimateapes
Ineed . read the passage, and choose the two (2) inferences that are most firmly based on the given information. up through the 1700s, many europeans believed that a kingβs touch could cure diseases. at his coronation in 1775, for example, king louis the sixteenth of france touched 2,400 of his ailing subjects. 1. the touch of a king truly has special healing power others do not have 2. there had been other kings of france named louis. 3. french coronations were public events. 4. the french suffered
Answers: 1
Which claim best responds to the writing prompt?
Writing prompt:
In 1945, the United States d...
In 1945, the United States d...
History, 07.10.2019 22:00
Biology, 07.10.2019 22:00
Geography, 07.10.2019 22:00
Business, 07.10.2019 22:00