Teaching slavery accurately is a diffult thing to do and it said the only really effective way to teach it is through primary documents of the enslaved people. why do you think this is? write about as many different things thag make teaching slavery awakard or uncomfortable as you can. can you depend on school textbooks to have accurate information on every subject? why or why not?

its everything except for telling nonfiction and using first person

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest

b

explanation: