Can someone help me, I need two comments for this Quote!! Topic Sentence: Banning electronic cigarettes would not only prevent them from being used to stop smoking, it represents an abuse of power from the government.

Quote: Helen Clair McNulty states that she is neither for nor against electronic cigarettes. She brings up the point that banning electronic cigarettes violates Americans rights: “But it makes me mad that the city government wants to take away our rights to do what we want to with our bodies. I also find the way they are handling this situation slightly comical” (1).

this is inaccurate because she is not picking one side to stay with and she is not explaining why she picks that side.

i hope this helps

Explanation:

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

i think the correct answer would be adjustments in life roles.  this causes for one to adjust or change totally his/her career or lifestyle since the present is not beneficial to the life role he is at. for instance, you became a mother you would of course stop going to malls and enjoying life outside. you would be staying at home taking care of your child.