MARKING AS BRAINLIST PLEASE HELPwrite an argumentative paragraph that uses the claim that parents should encourage their children to play role playing video games to build reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. Your paragraph should have knowledge of the counterclaim and respond to it using only the most relevant and credible pieces of evidence, provided below. Claim-parents should encourage their child to play role playing video games to build reading comprehension and critical thinking skills
Counter claim-video games are less effective in building reading comprehension and critical thinking than reading for extended periods of time
Evidence-a famous blogger says that he did better in school growing up because you play video games after school
Evidence-Jaime Sanchez a teacher writes in her journal article that the standardized test scores of the student who play video games in her District are overall higher than students who do not play video games
Evidence- child psychologist dr. Arnold Rickman tells a newspaper reporter that he found that his patient to play video games are more able to solve complex problems with patients who don't play video games

Buy ielts certificate without exam buy ielts certificate in usa buy ielts certificate in punjab buy ielts certificate online without exam buy original ielts certificate without exam in india ielts certificate without exam in gujarat ielts certificate without exam in delhi genuine ielts certificate what'sap (+237650862831)

In marian anderson sings the author begins the story by putting the reader right in the middle of the action what is the yearn for this type of organization

In just over one hundred years, between 1701 and 1810, 252,500 enslaved africans were brought to barbados—an island that occupies only 166 square miles (making it, today, one of the smallest countries in the world). the english then set out to conquer more sugar islands, starting with jamaica, which they took from spain in 1655. in the same period that the 252,500 africans were brought to barbados, 662,400 africans were taken to jamaica. thus, sugar drove more than 900,000 people into slavery, across the atlantic, to barbados and jamaica—and these were just two of the sugar islands. the english were eagerly filling antigua, nevis, saint kitts, and montserrat with slaves and sugar mills. they took over much of dutch guiana for the same reason. seeing the fortunes being made in sugar, the french started their own scramble to turn the half of the island of hispaniola that they controlled (which is now haiti), as well as martinique, guadeloupe, and french guiana (along the south american coast near dutch guiana), into their own sugar colonies, which were filled with hundreds of thousands more african slaves. by 1753, british ships were taking average of 34,250 slaves from africa every year, and by 1768, that number had reached 53,100. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how do the authors use historical evidence to support their claim? x(a) they use secondary sources to show how french and english monarchs were indifferent to enslaved people. x(b)they use secondary sources to show that enslaved people often fought for their freedom after arriving in the caribbean. the answer is: (c)they use facts from primary sources to show how countries increased the number of enslaved people to produce more sugar. x(d)they use primary source interviews to show that countries could make more money in trading sugar without using enslaved people.