What argument could someone disagree with springer stance make?

A person who disagrees with Springer can claim that rewarding students for good academic performance, through money, is showing that their dedication has value and can generate benefits for them. This type of reward, when well established, generates motivation in students.

Explanation:

This question is about "What gets students motivated to work harder? Not money" by Matthew G. Springer

Springer demonstrates an experiment he carried out in a large school district. This experiment shows that offering money to students in exchange for good academic performance has made no difference to students' lives, which reinforces the idea of paying students to study, does not guarantee that they will be motivated and interested in academic growth.

However, many people may disagree with this and claim that rewarding students by giving them money when they demonstrate good academic growth is positive. These people claim that to reward is to value the dedication of students at school and that in order for this type of reward to work, it is necessary that the money be provided after the student demonstrates good academic performance and not before.

the answer is d. books are banned from the library. this is an example of censorship because the library did not want people reading the content of those books. the library censored the books by banning them.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)