How do you know if a work of nonfiction is coherent? A:A word is coherent if the subject of the word contributed to it
B:I work as coherent if the important details support the main idea and connect to another clear order
C: A week is coherent if it shows the authors feelings towards the subject
D: A worker school here and if it does not show the bases of the time period in which it was written

London includes a quote about john thornton as he is observing hal attempt to motivate the exhausted dogs "it was idle, he knew, to get between a fool and his folly". if the word "idle" is defined as "of no real worth, importance, or significance", what does this statement mean with regard to hal? who is the fool? what is hal's folly? why would john thornton think it of no real worth or useless to intervene?