100 POINTS AND BRAINLIST PLZ HELP PROJECT: EVENTS AND TRENDS
For this project, you will examine a historical event or trend that you learned about in this unit.

OBJECTIVES
Analyze a historical event or trend to identify the setting; sequence of events; cause and effect; and the people involved.
Create an episode pattern organizer.
All historical events must be studied in the context of time and space. Much information can be gathered by examining a sequence of events and the setting in which those events took place.

It is also important to consider the cause and effect of historical events or trends. This helps us to compare similar episodes and assess their impact on history.

Most importantly, we must study the people who were involved in the historical events or trends. Remember, history did not just happen. It was actively created by the people who lived it.

Once this information has been collected, it can be organized in a graphic such as the one pictured below. This is called an episode pattern organizer. It can be useful to create these graphics as you continue to learn about historical events and trends in world history.

When you have completed this project, you will have learned that:

There is a cause and effect for every historical event or trend.
A sequence of events occurs in every episode.
People are involved in history.
Directions
Create an episode pattern organizer for any of the historical events or trends that you have learned about in this unit.

Here is a list of possible topics:

the Battle of Hastings
the expansion of Islam
the Crusades
the emergence of capitalist institutions in Europe
the Black Death
the development of humanism
trade, 1000–1500
migration, 1000–1500

Submit your project below.

thtahth hg nd d

explanation:

gfdhj rs tyh6r h ts eqagdas   d dy d   w 5js   tydtrs tfs4gtehtyhh

thousands of people

explanation:

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.

well if u read the book you would know that she meant to