Write an essay explaining how an image can be more powerful than words

An image is a thousand words. Images can be more powerful than words because everyone sees and image through their own eyes. An image has a story in each and every inch of it that all people see differently.  It tells a story through the look. The painting of Starry night for example. A child may just see colors and a brilliant sky, they dream about mysterious lands by seeing it, A artist will see the skill the brush strokes and the brilliance in it, a grown man might see the colors and the tall black plan looking thing and it remind him of something. A image gives meaning to all who see it but it is never the same meaning words are on paper they force an image into ones head instead of letting them interpret for themselves. Images bring emotions on a lot faster than words do. If you are at a funeral will a picture of the one you lost or the word about their life bring you to tears? Most likely both the picture most likely will faster. An image is a memory and it brings up so many emotions for one and joy, words can bring joy but they often fall short because you can only envision it not actually see a still of it.

Explanation:

I didn't write you an essay but here is a whole bunch of ideas you could incorporate into it! Good luck!

moon-letters were a method of writing invented by the dwarves. moon-letters were ordinary runes, but written in such a way that they could only be read when the light of the moon shone behind the writing. some moon-letters could be read by any moonlight, but it was possible to make the writing even more secret. more sophisticated moon-letters could only be read by the light of the same shape of moon, or at the same time of year, as when they were written. hope this !

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.